nu

The greenhouse | To govern is to foresee, and that certainly applies to climate policy

The greenhouse | To govern is to foresee, and that certainly applies to climate policy

Decades after early parliamentary warnings, climate change remains a complex political issue where personal experience with environmental disasters does not consistently guarantee public support for climate action. Global progress is further hampered by the fact that the most severe climate impacts often occur in regions with the lowest carbon footprints, necessitating a more proactive and international approach to policy.

The urgent need for climate policy remains a critical challenge, despite scientific warnings dating back thirty years. While experts suggest that experiencing the direct impacts of climate change—such as droughts, floods, or extreme heat—might drive public urgency, research shows that personal experience with climate disasters does not always correlate with stronger support for environmental policies. Even as the global climate continues to warm, with records being broken annually, there is a disconnect between recognizing the problem and prioritizing it politically, as seen in fluctuating voter priorities during election cycles.

Furthermore, the climate crisis presents a global injustice, as the most severe impacts often strike regions that contribute the least to greenhouse gas emissions. The reliance on short-term political and economic interests complicates necessary long-term action. As global temperatures rise due to factors like El Niño and shifting energy demands, addressing the crisis requires looking beyond immediate borders and personal experiences. Ultimately, effective governance requires foresight to prevent environmental catastrophes before they occur, rather than reacting only after the damage is already done.

Based on reporting by nu. Translated and condensed by LocalHeadlines.

Related articles

The Greenhouse | I prefer to jump on the facts rather than the barricade

The Greenhouse | I prefer to jump on the facts rather than the barricade

A climate journalist explores the tension between objective reporting and the pressure to advocate for systemic change to combat the climate crisis. The author concludes that journalists should remain factual rather than activist to effectively reach a wide and diverse audience.

Trade with Russia remains lucrative, but companies face risks

Trade with Russia remains lucrative, but companies face risks

Despite 21 rounds of European Union sanctions against Russia, some businesses continue to profit by using third-party countries to bypass export restrictions. Experts warn that while such trade is lucrative, it carries significant legal risks, including criminal prosecution and prison time for those who intentionally circumvent these measures.

Seizure of 'Antifa server' at US request leads to questions and concerns

Seizure of 'Antifa server' at US request leads to questions and concerns

Dutch authorities have seized a server belonging to the Italian hosting provider Autistici/Inventati at the request of the United States. The U.S. government classifies the company as a terrorist entity, sparking concerns among Dutch digital rights groups and industry associations regarding the precedent for such cross-border legal actions.

Russia welcomed back to IMF, Netherlands walks out during Russian speech

Russia welcomed back to IMF, Netherlands walks out during Russian speech

Dutch Finance Minister Eelco Heinen and several other delegations staged a walkout during an IMF meeting in Bangkok to protest the presence of sanctioned Russian officials. Minister Heinen emphasized that attending the session alongside these representatives would normalize ongoing Russian aggression.

Future of key climate report uncertain after failed negotiations

Future of key climate report uncertain after failed negotiations

Negotiations for the next IPCC climate assessment report have stalled due to disagreements over its release timeline and budget. While many countries want the report ready for the 2028 international climate policy review, others are pushing for delays, creating uncertainty regarding the organization's future operations.