rss

'Convenient trick' by Reinout Oerlemans in Raamplein plans is the last straw for district: "Adjust the rules"

'Convenient trick' by Reinout Oerlemans in Raamplein plans is the last straw for district: "Adjust the rules"

The Amsterdam district committee is pushing to close a loophole in the 40-40-20 housing rule after developer Reinout Oerlemans gained approval for a ten-unit luxury project at Raamplein. By building fewer than eleven apartments, the project avoids requirements for social and mid-range housing, prompting concerns from local groups regarding affordability and urban aesthetics.

The Amsterdam City Center district committee is calling for stricter building regulations following a controversial development project by Reinout Oerlemans at the Raamplein. The developer plans to build ten luxury apartments on the site of a former school, a move that bypasses the city's standard 40-40-20 housing distribution rule. This regulation requires new projects to include a specific percentage of social and mid-range housing, but it currently provides an exemption for projects consisting of fewer than eleven units. Critics, including local neighborhood associations and the VVAB, argue that the development is out of character with the historical surroundings and exacerbates the lack of affordable housing in the city center.

The district committee alleges that the developer deliberately reduced the project size from eighteen to ten units to exploit this legal loophole. They are now urging the municipal government to amend the rules before the adoption of the 2029 Housing Plan to prevent similar situations in the future. Despite significant local opposition and formal objections regarding the building's design, the city has already granted an environmental permit for the luxury project.

Based on reporting by rss. Translated and condensed by LocalHeadlines.

Related articles

Years of illegal use of Schiphol: environmental groups and local residents take legal action over cabinet plans

Years of illegal use of Schiphol: environmental groups and local residents take legal action over cabinet plans

A coalition of environmental groups and residents has challenged new government regulations for Schiphol Airport at the Council of State. The plaintiffs claim the rules legitimize years of illegal operations and are seeking a mandatory reduction in flight numbers.

Outdated information used in documents on tourist and advertising taxes

Outdated information used in documents on tourist and advertising taxes

The Amsterdam city council has delayed voting on tax regulation changes after officials discovered that outdated versions of the documents were inadvertently used. Finance Alderman Hendrik Jan Biemond apologized for the errors, which included technical inaccuracies in the definitions of tourist and advertising taxes, and rescheduled the vote for December.

Private landlords are renting out fewer properties in the city: "A problem for students"

Private landlords are renting out fewer properties in the city: "A problem for students"

Private rental properties in Amsterdam have decreased by 18 percent in three years as landlords sell their units due to new rent control laws and increased taxation. While this shift favors buyers, it creates a significant housing crisis for students and individuals who cannot afford to purchase property in the city.

No funding for Zuidasdok megaproject in new cabinet plans

No funding for Zuidasdok megaproject in new cabinet plans

The Dutch government has frozen funding for the northern part of the Zuidasdok project to prioritize the maintenance of existing national infrastructure. This decision delays one of the country's largest development projects, sparking concerns in Amsterdam over long-term economic and accessibility impacts.

Booking may require employees to work from the office two days a week

Booking may require employees to work from the office two days a week

The Amsterdam District Court has ruled that Booking.com can legally require its employees to work from the office for 40 percent of their weekly hours. The court accepted the company's argument that regular in-person contact is essential for fostering a strong corporate culture and team collaboration.